4.2 Article

Human induced pluripotent stem cells improve recovery in stroke-injured aged rats

Journal

RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 547-558

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-140404

Keywords

Stroke; neuroregeneration; inflammation; reprogramming; recovery; neural stem cell; aging; transplantation

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. European Union project TargetBraIn [279017]
  3. AFA Foundation
  4. Swedish Government Initiative for Strategic Research Areas (StemTherapy)
  5. Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation (Georgia)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) improve behavior and form neurons after implantation into the stroke-injured adult rodent brain. How the aged brain responds to grafted iPSCs is unknown. We determined survival and differentiation of grafted human fibroblast-derived iPSCs and their ability to improve recovery in aged rats after stroke. Methods: Twenty-four months old rats were subjected to 30 min distal middle cerebral artery occlusion causing neocortical damage. After 48 h, animals were transplanted intracortically with human iPSC-derived long-term neuroepithelial-like stem (hiPSC-lt-NES) cells. Controls were subjected to stroke and were vehicle-injected. Results: Cell-grafted animals performed better than vehicle-injected recipients in cylinder test at 4 and 7 weeks. At 8 weeks, cell proliferation was low (0.7 %) and number of hiPSC-lt-NES cells corresponded to 49.2% of that of implanted cells. Transplanted cells expressed markers of neuroblasts and mature and GABAergic neurons. Cell-grafted rats exhibited less activated microglia/macrophages in injured cortex and neuronal loss was mitigated. Conclusions: Our study provides the first evidence that grafted human iPSCs survive, differentiate to neurons and ameliorate functional deficits in stroke-injured aged brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available