3.8 Article

An approach for adaptive and integrated environmental planning to deal with uncertainty in a Great Barrier Reef Catchment

Journal

AUSTRALIAN PLANNER
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 243-259

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2013.837831

Keywords

natural resources; Australia; management; environmental management; institutional arrange-ments; sugar cane

Funding

  1. Australian Government
  2. programme through the Natural Heritage Trust
  3. Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management
  4. Commonwealth Department of Sustainability, Environment, Population and Communities, through the Great Barrier Reef National Environment Research Program administered by the Reef and Rainforest Research Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the Mossman Mill District Practices Framework. It was developed in the Wet Tropics region within the Great Barrier Reef in north-eastern Australia to describe the environmental benefits of agricultural management practices for the sugar cane industry. The framework translates complex, unclear and overlapping environmental plans, policy and legal arrangements into a simple framework of management practices that landholders can use to improve their management actions. Practices range from those that are old or outdated through to aspirational practices that have the potential to achieve desired resource condition targets. The framework has been applied by stakeholders at multiple scales to better coordinate and integrate a range of policy arrangements to improve natural resource management. It has been used to structure monitoring and evaluation in order to underpin a more adaptive approach to planning at mill district and property scale. Potentially, the framework and approach can be applied across fields of planning where adaptive management is needed. It has the potential to overcome many of the criticisms of property-scale and regional Natural Resource Management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available