3.8 Article

Assessment of dietary habits of patients with recurrent depressive disorders

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 39-46

Publisher

POLSKIE TOWARZYSTWO PSYCHIATRYCZNE-POLISH SOC PSYCHIATRY
DOI: 10.12740/APP/31780

Keywords

depression; frequency of consumption of products; adults adoptive family research methodology; adoption; adoptive family

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim. The aim of this study was evaluation of selected dietary habits of patients with recurrent depressive disorders. Methods. The study included 150 patients (75 patients suffering from recurrent depressive disorders. and 75 healthy people aged 18-64 years). The assessment of dietary habits was carried out by using a food frequency questionnaire. Results. It has been shown that in the compared groups of women, patients with depression consumed significantly less groats (p<0.001), rice (p=0.02), red meat (p<0.01), fish (p<0.01), vegetables (p<0.001), fruits (p<0.01) and wine (p<0.001) in comparison with women without depression, and they were significantly more likely to consume wheat-rye bread (p=0.03), cheese (p=0.02), butter (p=0.03), cream (p<0.01), lard (p<0.001), coffee (p=0.03) and sugar (p=0.02) in comparison with women without depression. Statistically significant differences between the two groups of men were diagnosed in the frequent intake of lard (p<0.001) and less frequent vegetable oils (p<0.01), beer (p=0.01), and fast food (p<0.01) for men with depression compared with men in the control group. Conclusions. In the treatment of patients with depression during the declared change of diet, the need for nutrition education on the principles of rational nutrition should be taken into attention, including the selection of appropriate food groups in order to ensure an optimal supply of all necessary to the proper functioning of the body's nutrients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available