Journal
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 55-61Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1463922X.2013.778355
Keywords
reliability; validity; ergonomics methods; TAFEI
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper is a commentary on Kanis' target paper in this issue. Kanis raised deficiencies in the reporting of reliability and validity of ergonomics methods in the literature and proposes a framework for the future. This paper applauds the approach and extends it. Despite the proliferation of ergonomics methods, there is a paucity of data on reliability and validity. There are many other aspects of the methods' performance that could be reported as well, including the utility of the method. The structure of method reporting would benefit from some standardisation to enable comparison of approaches and usability of the method itself. It is also understood that the gathering of data on reliability and validity will be ongoing, as methods evolve and domain boundaries are crossed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available