4.0 Article

High-throughput fluorescent-based NKCC functional assay in adherent epithelial cells

Journal

BMC CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2121-14-16

Keywords

NKCC activity; Fluorescent assay; High-throughput; Drug screening

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian grant PRIN [20078ZZMZW]
  2. Fondo per gli Investimenti della Ricerca di Base-Rete Nazionale di Proteomica [RBRN07BMCT_009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The kidney-specific NKCC cotransporter isoform NKCC2 is involved in the Na+ reabsorption in the Thich Ascending Limb (TAL) cells and in the regulation of body fluid volume. In contrast, the isoform NKCC1 represents the major pathway for Cl-entry in endothelial cells, playing a crucial role in cell volume regulation and vascular tone. Importantly, both NKCC isoforms are involved in the regulation of blood pressure and represent important potential drug targets for the treatment of hypertension. Results: Taking advantage of an existing Thallium (Tl+)-based kit, we set up a Tl+ influx-based fluorescent assay, that can accurately and rapidly measure NKCC transporter activity in adherent epithelial cells using the high-throughput Flex station device. We assessed the feasibility of this assay in the renal epithelial LLC-PK1 cells stably transfected with a previously characterized chimeric NKCC2 construct (c-NKCC2). We demonstrated that the assay is highly reproducible, offers high temporal resolution of NKCC-mediated ion flux profiles and, importantly, being a continuous assay, it offers improved sensitivity over previous endpoint NKCC functional assays. Conclusions: So far the screening of NKCC transporters activity has been done by Rb-86(+) influx assays. Indeed, a fluorescence-based high-throughput screening method for testing NKCC inhibitors would be extremely useful in the development and characterization of new anti-hypertensive drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available