4.6 Article

Tea consumption and the risk of five major cancers: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-197

Keywords

Tea consumption; Dose-response; Meta-analysis; Cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81001287, 81373105]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2008ZX10002-007, 2008ZX10002-018, 2008ZX10002-025]
  3. Leading Talents of Science in Shanghai [022]
  4. key discipline construction of evidence-based public health in Shanghai [12GWZX0602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies to summarize evidence of the association between tea consumption and the risk of breast, colorectal, liver, prostate, and stomach cancer. Methods: We searched PubMed and two other databases. Prospective studies that reported risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of cancer risk for >= 3 categories of tea consumption were included. We estimated an overall RR with 95% CI for an increase of three cups/day of tea consumption, and, usingrestricted cubic splines, we examined a nonlinear association between tea consumption and cancer risk. Results: Forty-one prospective studies, with a total of 3,027,702 participants and 49,103 cancer cases, were included. From the pooled overall RRs, no inverse association between tea consumption and risk of five major cancers was observed. However, subgroup analysis showed that increase in consumption of three cups of black tea per day was a significant risk factor for breast cancer (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32). Conclusion: Ourresults did not show a protective role of tea in five major cancers. Additional large prospective cohort studies are needed to make a convincing case for associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available