3.8 Review

The genetic basis of ankylosing spondylitis: new insights into disease pathogenesis

Journal

APPLICATION OF CLINICAL GENETICS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 105-115

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/TACG.S37325

Keywords

ankylosing spondylitis; genome-wide association studies; risk loci; ankylosis; joint and gut inflammation; clinical subsets

Funding

  1. Arthritis Society of Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. CIHR Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis (IMHA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a complex disease involving multiple risk factors, both genetic and environmental. AS patients are predominantly young men, and the disease is characterized by inflammation and ankylosis, mainly at the cartilage- bone interface and enthesis. HLA- B27 has been known to be the major AS- susceptibility gene for more than 40 years. Despite advances made in the past few years, progress in the search for non- human leukocyte antigen susceptibility genes has been hampered by the heterogeneity of the disease. Compared to other complex diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), fewer susceptibility loci have been identified in AS. Furthermore, non- major histocompatibility- complex susceptibility loci discovered, such as ERAP1 and IL23R, are likely contributors to joint inflammation. Identification and confirmation of functional variants remains a significant challenge of investigations involving genome- wide association studies (GWAS). It remains unclear why none of the AS- susceptibility genes identified in GWAS appear to be directly involved in the ankylosing process. Numerous reviews have recently been published on the genetics of AS. Therefore, aside from a brief summary of what AS GWAS has successfully achieved thus far, this review will focus on directions that could address unanswered questions raised by GWAS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available