4.6 Article

Emerging markers of cachexia predict survival in cancer patients

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-828

Keywords

Ghrelin; Leptin; Obestatin; Cancer cachexia; Survival; Biomarkers

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cachexia may occur in 40% of cancer patients, representing the major cause of death in more than 20% of them. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of leptin, ghrelin and obestatin as diagnostic and predictive markers of cachexia in oncologic patients. Their impact on patient survival was also evaluated. Methods: 140 adults with different cancer diagnoses were recruited. Thirty healthy volunteers served as control. Serum ghrelin, obestatin and leptin were tested at baseline and after a follow-up period of 18 months. Results: Ghrelin levels were significantly higher in cancer patients than in healthy subjects (573.31 +/- 130 vs 320.20 +/- 66.48 ng/ml, p < 0.0001), while obestatin (17.42 +/- 7.12 vs 24.89 +/- 5.54 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) and leptin (38.4 +/- 21.2 vs 76.28 +/- 17.48 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) values were lower. At ROC analyses the diagnostic profile of ghrelin (AUC 0.962; sensitivity 83%; specificity 98%), obestatin (AUC 0.798; sensitivity 74.5%; specificity 81.5%) and leptin (AUC 0.828; sensitivity 79%; specificity 73%) was superior to that of albumin (AUC 0.547; sensitivity 63%, specificity 69.4%) for detecting cachexia among cancer patients. On Cox multivariate analyses ghrelin (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 - 1.03; p < 0.0001) and leptin (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.92 - 0.96; p < 0.0001) were significant predictors of death even after correction for other known risk factors such as presence of metastasis and chronic kidney disease. Conclusion: Ghrelin and leptin are promising biomarkers to diagnose cachexia and to predict survival in cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available