4.6 Article

APRIL is overexpressed in cancer: link with tumor progression

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-83

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (equipe labellisee 2006), Paris, France, from INCA [R07001FN]
  2. MSCNET European strep [E06005FF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: BAFF and APRIL share two receptors - TACI and BCMA - and BAFF binds to a third receptor, BAFF-R. Increased expression of BAFF and APRIL is noted in hematological malignancies. BAFF and APRIL are essential for the survival of normal and malignant B lymphocytes, and altered expression of BAFF or APRIL or of their receptors (BCMA, TACI, or BAFF-R) have been reported in various B-cell malignancies including B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Methods: We compared the expression of BAFF, APRIL, TACI and BAFF-R gene expression in 40 human tumor types-brain, epithelial, lymphoid, germ cells-to that of their normal tissue counterparts using publicly available gene expression data, including the Oncomine Cancer Microarray database. Results: We found significant overexpression of TACI in multiple myeloma and thyroid carcinoma and an association between TACI expression and prognosis in lymphoma. Furthermore, BAFF and APRIL are overexpressed in many cancers and we show that APRIL expression is associated with tumor progression. We also found overexpression of at least one proteoglycan with heparan sulfate chains (HS), which are coreceptors for APRIL and TACI, in tumors where APRIL is either overexpressed or is a prognostic factor. APRIL could induce survival or proliferation directly through HS proteoglycans. Conclusion: Taken together, these data suggest that APRIL is a potential prognostic factor for a large array of malignancies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available