4.8 Article

Integrating bibliometrics and roadmapping methods: A case of dye-sensitized solar cell technology-based industry in China

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 205-222

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.007

Keywords

Emerging industry; Technology roadmap; Bibliometrics; Dye-sensitized solar cell; PV industry

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [11ZD140]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71203117]
  3. Chinese Academy of Engineering [2012-ZD-9]
  4. ECEC-HVEN European framework 7 project [295130]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging industries are attracting increasing attention as they engage in innovation activities that transgress the boundaries of science and technology. Policy makers and industrial communities use roadmapping methods to predict future industrial growth, but the existing bibliometric/workshop methods have limitations when analyzing the full-lifecycle industrial emergence, including the transitions between science, technology, application, and the mass market. This paper, therefore, proposes a framework that integrates bibliometrics and a technology roadmapping (TRM) workshop approach to strategize and plan the future development of the new, technology-based industry. The dye-sensitized solar cell technology-based industry in China is selected as a case study. In this case, the bibliometrics method is applied to analyze the existing position of science and technology, and TRM workshops are used to strategize the future development from technology to application and marketing. Key events and impact on the development of the new, technology-based industry have been identified. This paper will contribute to the roadmapping and foresight methodology, and will be of interest to solar photovoltaic industry researchers. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available