4.6 Article

Molecular evolution of dihydrouridine synthases

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-153

Keywords

Dihydrouridine synthases; Protein structure prediction; Fold recognition; Remote homology; RNA modification; Molecular evolution; Enzymes acting on RNA

Funding

  1. Foundation for Polish Science [TEAM/2009-4/2, POMOST_C/58]
  2. 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission (EC FP7) [HEALTHPROT, 229676]
  3. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [0067/P01/2010/70, 0083/IP1/2011/71, N N301 123138]
  4. Adam Mickiewicz University Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Dihydrouridine (D) is a modified base found in conserved positions in the D-loop of tRNA in Bacteria, Eukaryota, and some Archaea. Despite the abundant occurrence of D, little is known about its biochemical roles in mediating tRNA function. It is assumed that D may destabilize the structure of tRNA and thus enhance its conformational flexibility. D is generated post-transcriptionally by the reduction of the 5,6-double bond of a uridine residue in RNA transcripts. The reaction is carried out by dihydrouridine synthases (DUS). DUS constitute a conserved family of enzymes encoded by the orthologous gene family COG0042. In protein sequence databases, members of COG0042 are typically annotated as predicted TIM-barrel enzymes, possibly dehydrogenases, nifR3 family. Results: To elucidate sequence-structure-function relationships in the DUS family, a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis was carried out. We performed extensive database searches to identify all members of the currently known DUS family, followed by clustering analysis to subdivide it into subfamilies of closely related sequences. We analyzed phylogenetic distributions of all members of the DUS family and inferred the evolutionary tree, which suggested a scenario for the evolutionary origin of dihydrouridine-forming enzymes. For a human representative of the DUS family, the hDus2 protein suggested as a potential drug target in cancer, we generated a homology model. While this article was under review, a crystal structure of a DUS representative has been published, giving us an opportunity to validate the model. Conclusions: We compared sequences and phylogenetic distributions of all members of the DUS family and inferred the phylogenetic tree, which provides a framework to study the functional differences among these proteins and suggests a scenario for the evolutionary origin of dihydrouridine formation. Our evolutionary and structural classification of the DUS family provides a background to study functional differences among these proteins that will guide experimental analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available