4.6 Article

A novel method to compare protein structures using local descriptors

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-344

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N301 243736]
  2. Biocentrum-Ochota project [POIG.02.03.00-00-003/09 - ERDF]
  3. University of Warsaw [BST/BF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Protein structure comparison is one of the most widely performed tasks in bioinformatics. However, currently used methods have problems with the so-called difficult similarities, including considerable shifts and distortions of structure, sequential swaps and circular permutations. There is a demand for efficient and automated systems capable of overcoming these difficulties, which may lead to the discovery of previously unknown structural relationships. Results: We present a novel method for protein structure comparison based on the formalism of local descriptors of protein structure - DEscriptor Defined Alignment (DEDAL). Local similarities identified by pairs of similar descriptors are extended into global structural alignments. We demonstrate the method's capability by aligning structures in difficult benchmark sets: curated alignments in the SISYPHUS database, as well as SISY and RIPC sets, including non-sequential and non-rigid-body alignments. On the most difficult RIPC set of sequence alignment pairs the method achieves an accuracy of 77% (the second best method tested achieves 60% accuracy). Conclusions: DEDAL is fast enough to be used in whole proteome applications, and by lowering the threshold of detectable structure similarity it may shed additional light on molecular evolution processes. It is well suited to improving automatic classification of structure domains, helping analyze protein fold space, or to improving protein classification schemes. DEDAL is available online at http://bioexploratorium.pl/EP/DEDAL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available