4.6 Article

Assessment and comparison of extreme sea levels and waves during the 2013/14 storm season in two UK coastal regions

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 2209-2225

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-15-2209-2015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council Flood Memory Project [EP/K013513/1]
  2. EPSRC ACRoES (Adaptation and Resilience to Coast Energy Supply) project [EP/103590/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I035390/1, EP/K013513/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010012] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/K013513/1, EP/I035390/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extreme sea levels and waves experienced around the UK's coast during the 2013/14 winter caused extensive coastal flooding and damage. Coastal managers seek to place such extremes in relation to the anticipated standards of flood protection, and the long-term recovery of the natural system. In this context, return periods are often used as a form of guidance. This paper provides these levels for the winter storms, and discusses their application to the given data sets for two UK case study sites: Sefton, northwest England, and Suffolk, east England. Tide gauge records and wave buoy data were used to compare the 2013/14 storms with return periods from a national data set, and also joint probabilities of sea level and wave heights were generated, incorporating the recent events. The 2013/14 high waters and waves were extreme due to the number of events, as well as the extremity of the 5 December 2013 Xaver storm, which had a high return period at both case study sites. The national-scale impact of this event was due to its coincidence with spring high tide at multiple locations. Given that this event is such an outlier in the joint probability analyses of these observed data sets, and that the season saw several events in close succession, coastal defences appear to have provided a good level of protection. This type of assessment could in the future be recorded alongside defence performance and upgrade. Ideally other variables (e.g. river levels at estuarine locations) would also be included, and with appropriate offsetting for local trends (e.g. mean sea-level rise) so that the storm-driven component of coastal flood events can be determined. This could allow long-term comparison of storm severity, and an assessment of how sea-level rise influences return levels over time, which is important for consideration of coastal resilience in strategic management plans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available