4.5 Article

The moderating role of perceived organizational support on the relationship between emotional labor and job-related outcomes

Journal

MANAGEMENT DECISION
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 605-624

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/MD-07-2013-0379

Keywords

Job satisfaction; Emotional labour; Perceived organizational support; Job performance

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2012- 2012S1A5A2A01015919]
  2. AMOREPACIFIC Academic Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to attempt to investigate how emotional labor strategies (i.e. surface acting and deep acting) affect job performance through job satisfaction. Another important objective of this study was to see whether perceived organizational support (POS) moderates the relationship between emotional labor strategies and job-related outcomes (i.e. job satisfaction and job performance). Design/methodology/approach - Structural equation modeling analysis provided support for the hypotheses from a sample of 309 South Korean department store sales employees. Findings - The results revealed that surface acting had a negative effect, whereas deep acting had a positive effect on job satisfaction. In addition, the relationship between emotional labor strategies (i.e. surface acting and deep acting) and job performance was significantly mediated by job satisfaction. Finally, POS significantly moderated the relationship between surface acting and job satisfaction, as well as the relationship between deep acting and job performance. Originality/value - The findings of this study contributed to the literature by identifying the relationship between surface and deep acting on organizational outcomes (i.e. job satisfaction and job performance), especially in a collectivist society (i.e. South Korea). In addition, this study also confirmed the important role of POS based on the norm of reciprocity between an organization and its members.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available