4.6 Article

AWclust: point-and-click software for non-parametric population structure analysis

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-77

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [T32 ES007126] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39764, P50 NS039764] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Population structure analysis is important to genetic association studies and evolutionary investigations. Parametric approaches, e. g. STRUCTURE and L-POP, usually assume Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage equilibrium among loci in sample population individuals. However, the assumptions may not hold and allele frequency estimation may not be accurate in some data sets. The improved version of STRUCTURE (version 2.1) can incorporate linkage information among loci but is still sensitive to high background linkage disequilibrium. Nowadays, large-scale single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are becoming popular in genetic studies. Therefore, it is imperative to have software that makes full use of these genetic data to generate inference even when model assumptions do not hold or allele frequency estimation suffers from high variation. Results: We have developed point-and-click software for non-parametric population structure analysis distributed as an R package. The software takes advantage of the large number of SNPs available to categorize individuals into ethnically similar clusters and it does not require assumptions about population models. Nor does it estimate allele frequencies. Moreover, this software can also infer the optimal number of populations. Conclusion: Our software tool employs non-parametric approaches to assign individuals to clusters using SNPs. It provides efficient computation and an intuitive way for researchers to explore ethnic relationships among individuals. It can be complementary to parametric approaches in population structure analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available