4.6 Article

GeneChaser: Identifying all biological and clinical conditions in which genes of interest are differentially expressed

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-548

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health
  2. US National Library of Medicine [K22 LM008261]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01 GM079719]
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  5. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The amount of gene expression data in the public repositories, such as NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) has grown exponentially, and provides a gold mine for bioinformaticians, but has not been easily accessible by biologists and clinicians. Results: We developed an automated approach to annotate and analyze all GEO data sets, including 1,515 GEO data sets from 231 microarray types across 42 species, and performed 12,658 group versus group comparisons of 24 GEO-specified types. We then built GeneChaser, a web server that enables biologists and clinicians without bioinformatics skills to easily identify biological and clinical conditions in which a gene or set of genes was differentially expressed. GeneChaser displays these conditions in graphs, gives statistical comparisons, allows sort/filter functions and provides access to the original studies. We performed a single gene search for Nanog and a multiple gene search for Nanog, Oct4, Sox2 and LIN28, confirmed their roles in embryonic stem cell development, identified several drugs that regulate their expression, and suggested their potential roles in sex determination, abnormal sperm morphology, malaria infection, and cancer. Conclusion: We demonstrated that GeneChaser is a powerful tool to elucidate information on function, transcriptional regulation, drug-response and clinical implications for genes of interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available