Journal
POLITICAL STUDIES
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 529-547Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12107
Keywords
political parties; internet; campaigning; digital; normalisation
Categories
Funding
- ESRC [ES/H004602/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Economic and Social Research Council [ES/H004602/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A core question addressed by parties and internet scholars is whether the medium is equalising or normalising levels of inter-party competition, Are minor parties better placed to compete for voters' attention online (equalisation), or do major parties continue to dominate (normalisation)? To date, most research has supported the latter scenario through supply-side' comparisons of website content in a single election. This article re-examines the debate using Australian surveys of election candidates conducted between 2001 and 2010. As well as providing the first longitudinal study of this question, we link the supply side with voter responses and compare how well the parties recruit support through their web campaigns. Our results confirm that major parties dominate in the adoption of personal websites, although minor parties are stronger users of social media. Both strategies are effective in gaining votes, suggesting that the web may be rebalancing if not equalising party competition.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available