4.7 Article

Sex Differences in the Effects of Weight Loss Diets on Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition: POUNDS LOST Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages 2463-2471

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-1050

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL073286]
  2. General Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health [RR-02635]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Weight loss is associated with reduction in bone mineral density (BMD). Objective: The objective was to address the role of changes in fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM) in BMD decline in both sexes. Design: A 2-year randomized controlled trial, the Preventing Overweight Using Novel Dietary Strategies (POUNDS-LOST). Setting: The setting was the general community. Patients or Other Participants: Enrolled were 424 overweight and obese participants (mean age, 52 +/- 9 y; 57% females). Intervention: Intervention included weight loss diets differing in fat, protein, and carbohydrates. Main Outcome Measures: Main outcome measures were change in spine, total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) BMD and sex differences after dietary intervention. Results: At baseline, a stronger correlation between BMD and body composition measurements was observed in women, primarily with LM (r = 0.419, 0.507, and 0.523 for spine, FN, and TH, respectively; all P <.001). In men, only LM correlated with hip BMD (r = 0.298; P <.001). Mean weight loss at 2 years was -6.9%, without differencesamongdiets. Two-year changes in BMD were 0.005 (P =.04), -0.014 (P <.001), and -0.014 g/cm(2) (P <.001), at the spine, TH, and FN, respectively. These changes directly correlated with changes in LM in women (r = 0.200, 0.324, and 0.260 for spine, FN, and TH, respectively), whereas FM loss correlated only with changes in TH BMD (0.274; P <.001). In men, changes in LM(-0.323; P <.001) and FM(-0.213; P =.027) negatively correlated with changes in spine BMD. Conclusions: Weight loss diets result in sex-specific effects on BMD. Although men exhibited a paradoxical increase in spine BMD, womentended to decrease in BMD at all sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available