4.5 Article

Land use effects on soil organic carbon sequestration in calcareous Leptosols in former pastureland - a case study from the Tatra Mountains (Poland)

Journal

SOLID EARTH
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 1103-1115

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/se-6-1103-2015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State Committee for Scientific Research (Warsaw, Poland) [N N305 381 539]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the paper is to describe soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates in calcareous shallow soils in reforested areas in the Tatra Mountains with a particular focus on different forms of organic matter (OM) storage. Three plant communities creating a mosaic on the slopes of the studied valley were taken into account. Fifty years since the conversion of pastureland to unused grassland, dwarf pine shrub and larch forest have emerged in the study area, along with the development of genetic soil horizons as well as SOC sequestration in the soil despite the steepness of slopes. SOC stock was measured to be the highest in soils under larch forest (63.5 Mg ha(-1)), while in soil under grassland and under dwarf pine shrub, this value was found to be smaller (47.5 and 42.9 Mg ha(-1), respectively). The highest amount of mineral-associated OM inside stable microaggregates (MOM FF3) was found in grassland soil (21.9-27.1% of SOC) and less under dwarf pine shrub (16.3-19.3% of SOC) and larch forest (15.3-17.7% of SOC). A pool of mineral-associated OM inside transitional macroaggregates (MOM FF2) was found in soil under dwarf pine shrub (39.2-59.2% of SOC), with less under larch forest (43.8-44.7% of SOC) and the least in grassland soil (37.9-41.6% of SOC). The highest amount of the free light particulate fraction (POM LF1) was found in soil under dwarf pine shrub (6.6-10.3% of SOC), with less under larch forest (2.6-6.2% of SOC) and the least in grassland soil (1.7-4.8% of SOC).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available