4.0 Article

Gender, socio-economic variables and target organ damage in new-diagnosed hypertensive patients

Journal

BLOOD PRESSURE
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 213-222

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08037050903145923

Keywords

Gender; health inequalities; hypertension; socio-economic status; target organ damage

Funding

  1. AATRM (Agency for Technology Evaluation and Medical Research)
  2. Catalan Health Service
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya (Autonomous Catalan Government) [AATRM-155/12/2004]
  4. FIS (Health Research Fund)
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [FIS-03/0436]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study as to ascertain whether gender and socio-economic variables can explain differences in the degree of severity of hypertension (HT) at the time of diagnosis. Patients were recently diagnosed and never-treated hypertensives, seen in primary care sites and aged 15-75. This study also included a cohort of normotensive patients. All individuals were invited to respond a questionnaire to collect socio-demographic and socio-economic data. Target organ damage (TOD) is considered a marker of severity. Three hundred and eighty-eight individuals responded to the questionnaire, 277 hypertensive, 111 normotensive. In an ordered probit model, the odds ratio of presenting with more than one TOD were: Aged >67 (OR = 1.22; 1.06-1.38), being a smoker (OR = 1.21; 1.02-1.40) or ex-smoker (OR = 2.89; 1.27-4.51), primary school education (OR = 2.17; 1.47-2.87), being male (OR = 0.75; 0.59-0.90), being an agricultural worker (OR = 0.03; 0.00-0.05) or a salaried professional (OR = 0.96; 0.94-0.99). The results show differences in the severity of the HT in the initial assessment of the patient according to gender or other socio-economic variables. It is particularly important at the time of carrying out the diagnosis and the HT assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available