3.8 Article

Household Registration Reform, Labor Mobility and Optimization of the Urban Hierarchy

Journal

SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CHINA
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 130-151

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2015.1029673

Keywords

household registration reform; urban hierarchy; labor mobility

Funding

  1. Major Program of National Social Science Fund
  2. Research of Theory and Practice of Spatial Economics in China [13 ZD166]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  4. Research on the Location Choice heterogeneous Firms and Their Effect [71273285]
  5. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China
  6. Effect of Resource Allocation by Industry Transfer: Based on the Perspective of Enterprise [20130171110043]
  7. Humanities and Social Science Major Program
  8. Educational Commission of Guangdong Province in China
  9. Research on Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Industry
  10. Long-term mechanism of employment [2012ZGXM_ 0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rational hierarchy of rank-size distribution is indispensable for optimizing the urban hierarchy. On the basis of the number of permanent urban residents, using rank-size rule testing and core density estimation within the framework of spatial economics, we set up a labor force location choice model and conducted quantitative simulations. Our findings show that the structure of China's urban hierarchy differs from the pyramid structure of Zipf's Law, and the household registration system impedes the free movement of labor and makes the size distribution of cities deviate from Pareto optimality. Household registration (hukou) reform will be conducive to the optimization of the urban hierarchy. Optimizing the urban hierarchy should become a consistent objective in today's development of new-type urbanization, city clusters and metropolitan areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available