4.0 Article

Differences in response to fetal hemoglobin induction therapy in β-thalassemia and sickle cell disease

Journal

BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 58-62

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2009.02.006

Keywords

Thalassemia; Sickle cells; Hemoglobin expression; Butyrate; Hemin

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-073438]
  2. Ovation Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inducers of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) have shown considerable promise in the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD). However, the same agents have shown less clinical activity in beta-thalassemia (beta-Thal). To understand the basis of these differences in clinical effectiveness, we compared the effects of butyrate and hemin on the expression of the different globin genes in progenitors-derived erythroid cells from patients with beta-Thal intermedia and SCD. Exposure to butyrate resulted in an augmentation of gamma-globin mRNA levels in both SCD and beta-Thal. Interestingly, butyrate exposure increased alpha-globin expression in beta-Thal, while alpha-globin mRNA levels decreased in SCD in response to butyrate. As a result, the favorable effects of the butyrate-induced increase in gamma-globin expression on alpha:beta-like globin mRNA imbalance in beta-Thal were reduced as a result of the associated increase in alpha-globin expression. Hemin had similar but less profound effects on all three globin genes in both categories of patients. Although the majority of patients with beta-Thal did not correct their globin imbalance in response to butyrate or hemin induction of HbF in a minority of patients resulted in marked reduction in globin imbalance. Thus, we believe that the poor clinical response in a majority of patients with beta-Thal to inducers of gamma-globin expression may be a reflection of unfavorable effects of these agents on the other globin genes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available