4.7 Article

Acute myeloid leukemia ontogeny is defined by distinct somatic mutations

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 125, Issue 9, Pages 1367-1376

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-610543

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Friends of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  2. Edward P. Evans Foundation
  3. Harvard Catalyst KL2/CMeRIT Award
  4. Lady Tata Memorial Trust
  5. National Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute) [T32CA00917237, P01 CA108631]
  6. National Institutes of Health (National Institute of General Medical Sciences) [T32GM007753]
  7. National Institutes of Health (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Insitute) [R01HL082945]
  8. Gabrielle's Angel Foundation
  9. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  10. Flames/Pan Mass Challenge
  11. Ted Rubin Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can develop after an antecedent myeloid malignancy (secondary AML [s-AML]), after leukemogenic therapy (therapy-related AML [t-AML]), or without an identifiable prodrome or known exposure (de novo AML). The genetic basis of these distinct pathways of AML development has not been determined. We performed targeted mutational analysis of 194 patients with rigorously defined s-AML or t-AML and 105 unselected AML patients. The presence of a mutation in SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, ZRSR2, ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR, or STAG2 was >95% specific for the diagnosis of s-AML. Analysis of serial samples from individual patients revealed that these mutations occur early in leukemogenesis and often persist in clonal remissions. In t-AML and elderly de novo AML populations, these alterations define a distinct genetic subtype that shares clinicopathologic properties with clinically confirmed s-AML and highlights a subset of patients with worse clinical outcomes, including a lower complete remission rate, more frequent reinduction, and decreased event-free survival. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00715637.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available