4.7 Article

Impact of induction regimen and stem cell transplantation on outcomes in double-hit lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 124, Issue 15, Pages 2354-2361

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-578963

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Millennium
  2. Seattle Genetics
  3. Celgene
  4. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
  5. Janssen
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Otsuka
  8. Genentech
  9. Acerta
  10. Infinity
  11. Onyx
  12. Janssen Oncology
  13. Gilead Sciences
  14. Spectrum
  15. Bristol Meyers Squibb
  16. Roche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL), which is characterized by rearrangements of MYC and either BCL2 or BCL6, face poor prognoses. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of the impact of baseline clinical factors, induction therapy, and stem cell transplant (SCT) on the outcomes of 311 patients with previously untreated DHL. At median follow-up of 23 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates among all patients were 10.9 and 21.9 months, respectively. Forty percent of patients remain disease-free and 49% remain alive at 2 years. Intensive induction was associated with improved PFS, but not OS, and SCT was not associated with improved OS among patients achieving first complete remission (P = .14). By multivariate analysis, advanced stage, central nervous system involvement, leukocytosis, and LDH>3 times the upper limit of normal were associated with higher risk of death. Correcting for these, intensive induction was associated with improved OS. We developed a novel risk score for DHL, which divides patients into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups. In conclusion, a subset of DHL patients may be cured, and some patients may benefit from intensive induction. Further investigations into the roles of SCT and novel agents are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available