4.7 Article

Differential impact of allelic ratio and insertion site in FLT3-ITD-positive AML with respect to allogeneic transplantation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 124, Issue 23, Pages 3441-3449

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-578070

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Else Kroner-Fresenius-Stiftung (Forschungskolleg Ulm) [2010_Kolleg.24]
  2. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [01GI9981, 01KG0605]
  3. German Research Foundation [DFG FI405/5-1, BU 1339/3-1, BU 1339/5-1, SFB 1074B3]
  4. Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung [DJCLS H 05/02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of allelic ratio and insertion site (IS) of internal tandem duplications (ITDs), as well as concurrent gene mutations, with regard to postremission therapy in 323 patients with FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Increasing FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (P = .004) and IS in the tyrosine kinase domain 1 (TKD1, P = .06) were associated with low complete remission (CR) rates. After postremission therapy including intensive chemotherapy (n = 121) or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT, n = 17), an allelic ratio >= 0.51 wasassociated with an unfavorable relapse-free (RFS, P = .0008) and overall survival (OS, P5.004); after allogeneic HSCT (n = 93), outcome was significantly improved in patients with a high allelic ratio (RFS, P = .02; OS, P = .03), whereas no benefit was seen in patients with a low allelic ratio (RFS, P = .38; OS, P = .64). Multivariable analyses revealed a high allelic ratio as a predictive factor for the beneficial effect of allogeneic HSCT; ITD IS in TKD1 remained an unfavorable factor, whereas no prognostic impact of concurrent gene mutations was observed. The clinical trials described herein were previously published or are registered as follows: AMLHD93 and AMLHD98A, previously published; AML SG 07-04, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00151242.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available