3.8 Article

Test-retest reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire

Journal

FATIGUE-BIOMEDICINE HEALTH AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 16-32

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2014.978110

Keywords

myalgic encephalomyelitis; myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; chronic fatigue syndrome; reliability; DePaul Symptom Questionnaire

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [AI 49720, AI 055735]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI105781, R01AI049720, R01AI055735] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) was developed to provide a structured approach for collecting standardized symptomatology and health history information to allow researchers and clinicians to determine whether a patient meets the diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), myalgic encephalomyelitis ( ME), and/or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the DSQ. Methods: Test-retest reliability of the measure was examined with a sample of 26 adults self-identifying as having either ME/CFS, ME, and/or CFS and 25 adults who did not self-identify as having these illnesses and were otherwise healthy controls. Results: Overall, the majority of items on the DSQ exhibited good to excellent test-retest reliability, with Pearson's or kappa correlation coefficients that were 0.70 or higher. Conclusions: Thus, the present study suggests that the DSQ is a reliable diagnostic measure that can provide a standardized way of examining illness constructs and symptomatology among patients who identify as having ME/CFS, ME, and/or CFS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available