4.7 Article

Genomic impact of transient low-dose decitabine treatment on primary AML cells

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 121, Issue 9, Pages 1633-1643

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-459313

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01CA101937, RO1CA162086]
  2. Barnes Jewish Hospital Foundation [00 335-0505-02]
  3. National Human Genome Research Institute [U54 HG003079]
  4. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  5. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center [P30CA91842]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by dysregulated gene expression and abnormal patterns of DNA methylation; the relationship between these events is unclear. Many AML patients are now being treated with hypomethylating agents, such as decitabine (DAC), although the mechanisms by which it induces remissions remain unknown. The goal of this study was to use a novel stromal coculture assay that can expand primary AML cells to identify the immediate changes induced by DAC with a dose (100nM) that decreases total 5-methylcytosine content and reactivates imprinted genes (without causing myeloid differentiation, which would confound downstream genomic analyses). Using array-based technologies, we found that DAC treatment caused global hypomethylation in all samples (with a preference for regions with higher levels of baseline methylation), yet there was limited correlation between changes in methylation and gene expression. Moreover, the patterns of methylation and gene expression across the samples were primarily determined by the intrinsic properties of the primary cells, rather than DAC treatment. Although DAC induces hypomethylation, we could not identify canonical target genes that are altered by DAC in primary AML cells, suggesting that the mechanism of action of DAC is more complex than previously recognized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available