4.7 Article

Denileukin diftitox (ONTAK) induces a tolerogenic phenotype in dendritic cells and stimulates survival of resting Treg

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 122, Issue 13, Pages 2185-2194

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-456988

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) via the Collaborative Research Center [SFB 643, A9, B9, A7, C1, C2, Z1]
  2. BayGene
  3. TR52
  4. European Community [LSHC-CT-2006-518234, DC-THERA LSHB-CT-2004-512074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Denileukin diftitox (DD), a diphtheria toxin fragment IL-2 fusion protein, is thought to target and kill CD25(+) cells. It is approved for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and is used experimentally for the depletion of regulatory T cells (T-reg) in cancer trials. Curiously enough, clinical effects of DD did not strictly correlate with CD25 expression, and T-reg depletion was not confirmed unambiguously. Here, we report that patients with melanoma receiving DD immediately before a dendritic cell (DC) vaccine failed to develop a tumor-antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell immune response even after repeated vaccinations. Analyzing the underlying mechanism, so far we found unknown effects of DD. First, DD modulated DCs toward tolerance by downregulating costimulatory receptors such as CD83 and CD25 while upregulating tolerance-associated proteins/pathways including Stat-3, beta-catenin, and class II transactivator-dependent antigen presentation. Second, DD blocked Stat3 phosphorylation in maturing DCs. Third, only activated, but not resting, T-reg internalized DD and were killed. Conversely, resting T-reg showed increased survival because of DD-mediated antiapoptotic IL-2 signaling. We conclude that DD exerts functions beyond CD25(+) cell killing that may affect their clinical use and could be tested for novel indications. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, #NCT00056134.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available