4.7 Article

Specific gene delivery to liver sinusoidal and artery endothelial cells

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 122, Issue 12, Pages 2030-2038

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-11-468579

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. DFG [GRK1172]
  2. 7th European Community program project Persist
  3. LOEWE Center for Cell and Gene Therapy Frankfurt
  4. Hessian Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and the Arts [III L 4- 518/17.004]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 738]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different types of endothelial cells (EC) fulfill distinct tasks depending on their microenvironment. ECs are therefore difficult to genetically manipulate ex vivo for functional studies or gene therapy. We assessed lentiviral vectors (LVs) targeted to the EC surface marker CD105 for in vivo gene delivery. The mouse CD105-specific vector, mCD105-LV, transduced only CD105-positive cells in primary liver cell cultures. Upon systemic injection, strong reporter gene expression was detected in liver where mCD105-LV specifically transduced liver sinusoidal ECs (LSECs) but not Kupffer cells, which were mainly transduced by nontargeted LVs. Tumor ECs were specifically targeted upon intratumoral vector injection. Delivery of the erythropoietin gene with mCD105-LV resulted in substantially increased erythropoietin and hematocrit levels. The human CD105-specific vector (huCD105-LV) transduced exclusively human LSECs in mice transplanted with human liver ECs. Interestingly, when applied at higher dose and in absence of target cells in the liver, huCD105-LV transduced ECs of a human artery transplanted into the descending mouse aorta. The data demonstrate for the first time targeted gene delivery to specialized ECs upon systemic vector administration. This strategy offers novel options to better understand the physiological functions of ECs and to treat genetic diseases such as those affecting blood factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available