4.7 Article

Outcome of patients with hemoglobinopathies given either cord blood or bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages 1072-1078

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-489112

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro progetto 5xmille
  2. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
  3. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica
  4. IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu
  5. National Institute Health Research-Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyzed the outcomes of 485 patients with thalassemia major (TM) or sickle cell disease (SCD) receiving HLA-identical sibling cord blood transplantation (CBT, n=96) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT, n=389). Compared with patients given BMT, CBT recipients were significantly younger (median age 6 vs 8 years, P=.02), and were treated more recently (median year 2001 vs 1999, P<.01). A higher proportion of patients with TM belonging to classes II-III of the Pesaro classification received BMT (44%) compared with CBT (39%, P<.01). In comparison with patients receiving BMT(n5259, TM; n=130, SCD), those given CBT (n=66, TM; n=30, SCD) had slower neutrophil recovery, less acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and none had extensive chronic GVHD. With a median follow-up of 70 months, the 6-year overall survival was 95% and 97% after BMT and CBT, respectively (P=.92). The 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 86% and 80% in TM patients after BMT and CBT, respectively, whereas DFS in SCD patients was 92% and 90%, respectively. The cell dose infused did not influence outcome of patients given CBT. In multivariate analysis, DFS did not differ between CBT and BMT recipients. Patients with TM or SCD have excellent outcomes after both HLA-identical sibling CBT and BMT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available