4.7 Article

The shortest isoform of C/EBPβ, liver inhibitory protein (LIP), collaborates with Evi1 to induce AML in a mouse BMT model

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 121, Issue 20, Pages 4142-4155

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-368654

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Japan Leukemia Research Fund
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24790964, 23249051, 24790961, 23130503, 24659457, 23591369] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecotropic viral integration site 1 (Evi1) is one of the master regulators in the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome. High expression of Evi1 is found in 10% of patients with AML and indicates a poor outcome. Several recent studies have indicated that Evi1 requires collaborative factors to induce AML. Therefore, the search for candidate factors that collaborate with Evi1 in leukemogenesis is one of the key issues in uncovering the mechanism of Evi1-related leukemia. Previously, we succeeded in making a mouse model of Evi1-related leukemia using a bone marrow transplantation (BMT) system. In the Evi1-induced leukemic cells, we identified frequent retroviral integrations near the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBP beta) gene and overexpression of its protein. These findings imply that C/EBP beta is a candidate gene that collaborates with Evi1 in leukemogenesis. Cotransduction of Evi1 and the shortest isoform of C/EBP beta, liver inhibitory protein (LIP), induced AML with short latencies in a mouse BMT model. Overexpression of LIP alone also induced AML with longer latencies. However, excision of all 3 isoforms of C/EBP beta (LAP*/LAP/LIP) did not inhibit the development of Evi1-induced leukemia. Therefore, isoform-specific intervention that targets LIP is required when we consider C/EBP beta as a therapeutic target.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available