4.7 Article

Plasma CXCL9 elevations correlate with chronic GVHD diagnosis

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages 786-793

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-08-520072

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. RayBiotech
  2. Briskin/Schlafer Pediatric Oncology Investigators Fund
  3. University of Michigan Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Junior Faculty Grant
  4. National Marrow Donor Program [200513, R01CA174667]
  5. Chronic GVHD Consortium part of the NIH Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network [U54 CA163438]
  6. [R01CA118953]
  7. [U54CA163438]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are no validated biomarkers for chronic GVHD (cGVHD). We used a protein microarray and subsequent sequential enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to compare 17 patients with treatment-refractory de novo-onset cGVHD and 18 time-matched control patients without acute or chronic GVHD to identify 5 candidate proteins that distinguished cGVHD from no cGVHD: CXCL9, IL2R alpha, elafin, CD13, and BAFF. We then assessed the discriminatory value of each protein individually and in composite panels in a validation cohort (n=109). CXCL9 was found to have the highest discriminatory value with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.91). CXCL9 plasma concentrations above the median were associated with a higher frequency of cGVHD even after adjustment for other factors related to developing cGVHD including age, diagnosis, donor source, and degree of HLA matching (71% vs 20%; P < .001). A separate validation cohort from a different transplant center (n 5 211) confirmed that CXCL9 plasma concentrations above the median were associated with more frequent newly diagnosed cGVHD after adjusting for the aforementioned factors (84% vs 60%; P = .001). Our results confirm that CXCL9 is elevated in patients with newly diagnosed cGVHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available