4.7 Article

CHEMICAL CARTOGRAPHY WITH APOGEE: METALLICITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS AND THE CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF THE MILKY WAY DISK

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 808, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/132

Keywords

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: disk; Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: stellar content; Galaxy: structure

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-1109718, AST-1211853]
  2. John N. Bahcall Fellowship
  3. W.M. Keck Foundation
  4. McLaughlin Fellowship at the University of Michigan
  5. Vanderbilt Office of the Provost through Vanderbilt Initiative in Data-intensive Astrophysics (VIDA)
  6. Physics Frontier Center/Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics (JINA) [PHY 08-22648]
  7. Physics Frontier Center/JINA Center for the Evolution of the Elements (JINA-CEE) [PHY 1430152]
  8. US National Science Foundation
  9. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AYA-2011-27754]
  10. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  11. National Science Foundation
  12. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  13. University of Arizona
  14. Brazilian Participation Group
  15. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  16. Carnegie Mellon University
  17. University of Florida
  18. French Participation Group
  19. German Participation Group
  20. Harvard University
  21. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  22. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  23. Johns Hopkins University
  24. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  25. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  26. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  27. New Mexico State University
  28. New York University
  29. Ohio State University
  30. Pennsylvania State University
  31. University of Portsmouth
  32. Princeton University
  33. Spanish Participation Group
  34. University of Tokyo
  35. University of Utah
  36. Vanderbilt University
  37. University of Virginia
  38. University of Washington
  39. Yale University
  40. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M000966/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  41. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1109178] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  42. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1211853, 1109888] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  43. Division Of Physics [1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a sample of 69,919 red giants from the SDSS-III/APOGEE Data Release 12, we measure the distribution of stars in the [alpha/Fe] versus [Fe/H] plane and the metallicity distribution functions (MDFs) across an unprecedented volume of the Milky Way disk, with radius 3 < R < 15 kpc and height vertical bar vertical bar < 2 kpc. Stars in the inner disk (R < 5 kpc) lie along a single track in [alpha/Fe] versus [Fe/H], starting with alpha-enhanced, metal-poor stars and ending at [alpha/Fe] similar to 0 and [Fe/H] similar to + 0.4. At larger radii we find two distinct sequences in [alpha/Fe] versus [Fe/H] space, with a roughly solar-alpha sequence that spans a decade in metallicity and a high-alpha sequence that merges with the low-alpha sequence at super-solar [Fe/H]. The location of the high-alpha sequence is nearly constant across the disk;. however, there are very few high-alpha stars at R > 11 kpc. The peak of the midplane MDF shifts to lower metallicity at larger R, reflecting the Galactic metallicity gradient. Most strikingly, the shape of the midplane MDF changes systematically with radius, from a negatively skewed distribution at 3 < R < 7 kpc, to a roughly Gaussian distribution at the solar annulus, to a positively skewed shape in the outer Galaxy. For stars with vertical bar z vertical bar > 1 kpc or [alpha/Fe] > 0.18, the MDF shows little dependence on R. The positive skewness of the outer-disk MDF may be a signature of radial migration; we show that blurring of stellar populations by orbital eccentricities is not enough to explain the reversal of MDF shape, but a simple model of radial migration can do so.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available