4.7 Article

PPARα and fatty acid oxidation mediate glucocorticoid resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages 969-980

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-489468

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Coxford family Research Fund
  5. Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology from the University of Toronto

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) can be a useful treatment for aggressive forms of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, their mechanism of action is not well understood, and resistance to GCs is inevitable. In a minimal, serum-free culture system, the synthetic GC dexamethasone (DEX) was found to decrease the metabolic activity of CLL cells, indicated by down-regulation of pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) expression and activity, decreased levels of pyruvate and its metabolites, and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. This metabolic restriction was associated with decreased size and death of some of the tumor cells in the population. Concomitant plasma membrane damage increased killing of CLL cells by DEX. However, the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha), which regulates fatty acid oxidation, was also increased by DEX, and adipocyte-derived lipids, lipoproteins, and propionic acid protected CLL cells from DEX. PPAR alpha and fatty acid oxidation enzyme inhibitors increased DEX-mediated killing of CLL cells in vitro and clearance of CLL xenografts in vivo. These findings suggest that GCs prevent tumor cells from generating the energy needed to repair membrane damage, fatty acid oxidation is a mechanism of resistance to GC-mediated cytotoxicity, and PPARa inhibition is a strategy to improve the therapeutic efficacy of GCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available