4.7 Article

Gene therapy for adenosine deaminase-deficient severe combined immune deficiency: clinical comparison of retroviral vectors and treatment plans

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 120, Issue 18, Pages 3635-3646

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-400937

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Clinical Research Award from the Saban Research Institute of Children's Hospital Los Angeles, a Distinguished Clinical Scientist Award from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  2. NHLBI SCOR grant [1P50 HL54850]
  3. FDA [1 RO1 FD003005]
  4. UCLA GCRC [MO1 RR000865]
  5. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  6. NHGRI
  7. NIDDK
  8. NCI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted a gene therapy trial in 10 patients with adenosine deaminase (ADA)-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency using 2 slightly different retroviral vectors for the transduction of patients' bone marrow CD34(+) cells. Four subjects were treated without pretransplantation cytoreduction and remained on ADA enzyme-replacement therapy (ERT) throughout the procedure. Only transient (months), low-level (< 0.01%) gene marking was observed in PBMCs of 2 older subjects (15 and 20 years of age), whereas some gene marking of PBMC has persisted for the past 9 years in 2 younger subjects (4 and 6 years). Six additional subjects were treated using the same gene transfer protocol, but after withdrawal of ERT and administration of low-dose busulfan (65-90 mg/m(2)). Three of these remain well, off ERT (5, 4, and 3 years postprocedure), with gene marking in PBMC of 1%-10%, and ADA enzyme expression in PBMC near or in the normal range. Two subjects were restarted on ERT because of poor gene marking and immune recovery, and one had a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These studies directly demonstrate the importance of providing nonmyeloablative pretransplantation conditioning to achieve therapeutic benefits with gene therapy for ADA-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency. (Blood. 2012;120(18):3635-3646)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available