4.7 Article

T cells from CLL patients exhibit features of T-cell exhaustion but retain capacity for cytokine production

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 121, Issue 9, Pages 1612-1621

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-457531

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. CR-UK
  2. European Hematology Association
  3. MRC
  4. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA95426]
  5. Goldman Sachs
  6. MRC [G0902269] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [G0902269] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

T-cell exhaustion, originally described in chronic viral infections, was recently reported in solid and hematologic cancers. It is not defined whether exhaustion contributes to T-cell dysfunction observed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We investigated the phenotype and function of T cells from CLL patients and age-matched controls. CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells from CLL patients had increased expression of exhaustion markers CD244, CD160, and PD1, with expansion of a PD1(+)BLIMP1(HI) subset. These molecules were most highly expressed in the expanded population of effector T cells in CLL. CLL CD8(+) T cells showed functional defects in proliferation and cytotoxicity, with the cytolytic defect caused by impaired granzyme packaging into vesicles and nonpolarized degranulation. In contrast to virally induced exhaustion, CLL T cells showed increased production of interferon-gamma and TNF alpha and increased expression of TBET, and normal IL2 production. These defects were not restricted to expanded populations of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cells, although CMV seropositivity modulated the distribution of lymphocyte subsets, the functional defects were present irrespective of CMV serostatus. Therefore, although CLL CD8(+) T cells exhibit features of T-cell exhaustion, they retain the ability to produce cytokines. These findings also exclude CMV as the sole cause of T-cell defects in CLL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available