4.7 Article

Incidence of neoplasia in Diamond Blackfan anemia: a report from the Diamond Blackfan Anemia Registry

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 16, Pages 3815-3819

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-375972

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL 079571-07]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  3. Pediatric Cancer Foundation
  4. National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome characterized by red cell aplasia and congenital anomalies. A predisposition to cancer has been suggested but not quantified by case reports. The DBA Registry of North America (DBAR) is the largest established DBA patient cohort, with prospective follow-up since 1991. This report presents the first quantitative assessment of cancer incidence in DBA. Among 608 patients with 9458 person-years of follow-up, 15 solid tumors, 2 acute myeloid leukemias, and 2 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome were diagnosed at a median age of 41 years in patients who had not received a bone marrow transplant. Cancer incidence in DBA was significantly elevated. The observed-to-expected ratio for all cancers combined was 5.4 (P < .05); significant observed-to-expected ratios were 287 for myelodysplastic syndrome, 28 for acute myeloid leukemia, 36 for colon carcinoma, 33 for osteogenic sarcoma, and 12 for female genital cancers. The median survival was 56 years, and the cumulative incidence of solid tumor/leukemia was approximately 20% by age 46 years. As in Fanconi anemia and dyskeratosis congenita, DBA is both an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome and a cancer predisposition syndrome; cancer risks appear lower in DBA than in Fanconi anemia or dyskeratosis congenita. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00106015. (Blood. 2012;119(16):3815-3819)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available