4.7 Article

Outcomes 5 years after response to rituximab therapy in children and adults with immune thrombocytopenia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 25, Pages 5989-5995

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-393975

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH1U01HL72196-01-05]
  2. Children's Cancer & Blood Foundation
  3. Dana Hammond Stubgen
  4. Amgen France
  5. Roche France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatments for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) providing durable platelet responses without continued dosing are limited. Whereas complete responses (CRs) to B-cell depletion in ITP usually last for 1 year in adults, partial responses (PRs) are less durable. Comparable data do not exist for children and 5-year outcomes are unavailable. Patients with ITP treated with rituximab who achieved CRs and PRs (platelets > 150 x 10(9)/L or 50-150 x 10(9)/L, respectively) were selected to be assessed for duration of their response; 72 adults whose response lasted at least 1 year and 66 children with response of any duration were included. Patients had baseline platelet counts < 30 x 10(9)/L; 95% had ITP of > 6 months in duration. Adults and children each had initial overall response rates of 57% and similar 5-year estimates of persisting response (21% and 26%, respectively). Children did not relapse after 2 years from initial treatment whereas adults did. Initial CR and prolonged B-cell depletion predicted sustained responses whereas prior splenectomy, age, sex, and duration of ITP did not. No novel or substantial long-term clinical toxicity was observed. In summary, 21% to 26% of adults and children with chronic ITP treated with standard-dose rituximab maintained a treatment-free response for at least 5 years without major toxicity. These results can inform clinical decision-making. (Blood. 2012; 119(25): 5989-5995)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available