4.7 Article

Double unit grafts successfully extend the application of umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages 752-758

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-449108

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Public Health Service [U24-CA76518]
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Health Resources and Services Administration [HHSH234200637015C]
  5. Office of Naval Research, Department of Navy to the National Marrow Donor Program [N00014-10-01-0204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell dose is a major limitation for umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation because units containing a minimum of 2.5 x 10(7) total nucleated cells (TNC)/kilogram patient body weight are frequently not available. The transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched UCB units has been adopted as a simple approach for increasing the TNC. We sought to determine whether the relative safety and efficacy of this approach was comparable with a single UCB transplantation. Included are adults with acute leukemia who received transplants with 1 (n = 106) or 2 (n = 303) UCB units. All UCB units for single UCB transplantations contained TNC >= 2.5 x 10(7)/kg. For double UCB transplantations, the total TNC for units 1 and 2 were > 2.5 x 10(7)/kg but in approximately half of these transplantations, 1 of the 2 units contained < 2.5 x 10(7) TNC/kg. Adjusting for factors associated with outcomes, risks of neutrophil recovery (odds ratio 0.83, P = .59), transplantation-related mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, P = .63), relapse (HR 0.90, P = .64), and overall mortality (HR 0.93, P = .62) was similar after double UCB and adequate dose single UCB transplantations. These data support double UCB unit transplantation for acute leukemia when an adequately dosed single UCB unit is not available thereby extending access to nearly all patients. (Blood. 2013; 121(5): 752-758)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available