4.7 Article

Reduced-intensity conditioning transplantation in acute leukemia: the effect of source of unrelated donor stem cells on outcomes

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 23, Pages 5591-5598

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-400630

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Public Health Service from the National Cancer Institute [U24-CA76518]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Health Resources and Services Administration [HHSH234200637015C]
  3. Office of Naval Research, Department of Navy [N00014-10-01-0204]
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the relative efficacy of coinfusing 2 umbilical cord blood units (dUCB) compared with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) from 8 of 8 or 7 of 8 HLA-matched unrelated donors. All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. Four treatment groups were evaluated: 4-6 of 6 matched dUCB-TCF (n = 120; TCF = total body irradiation [TBI] 200 cGy + cyclophosphamide + fludarabine), 4-6 of 6 matched dUCB-other (n = 40; alkylating agent + fludarabine +/- TBI), and 8 of 8 (n = 313) and 7 of 8 HLA-matched PBPCs (n = 111). Compared with matched 8 of 8 PBPC transplantations, transplantation-related mortality (TRM), and overall mortality were similar after dUCB-TCF (relative risk [RR] 0.72, P = .72; RR 0.93, P = .60) but higher after dUCB-other RIC (hazard ratio [HR] 2.70, P = .0001; 1.79 P = .004). Compared with 7 of 8 PBPC transplantations, TRM (but not overall mortality) was lower after dUCB-TCF (RR 0.57, P = .04; RR 0.87 P = .41). The probabilities of survival after dUCB-TCF, dUCB-other RIC, and 8 of 8 PBPC and 7 of 8 PBPC transplantations were 38%, 19%, 44%, and 37%, respectively. With similar survival after 8 of 8, 7 of 8 matched PBPCs, and dUCB-TCF, these data support use of dUCB-TCF transplantation in adults with acute leukemia who may benefit from RIC transplantation urgently or lack a 7-8 of 8 unrelated donor. (Blood. 2012;119(23):5591-5598)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available