4.7 Article

The superiority of haploidentical related stem cell transplantation over chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 23, Pages 5584-5590

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-389809

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2011AA020105]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30971292, 30800485]
  3. Beijing Novel program [2008B05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the results of a prospective, patient self-selected study evaluating whether haploidentical related donor stem cell transplantation (HRD-HSCT) is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate-or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Among totally 419 newly diagnosed AML patients, 132 patients with intermediate-and high-risk cytogenetics achieved CR1 and received chemotherapy alone (n = 74) or HSCT (n = 58) as postremission treatment. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 4 years was 37.5% +/- 4.5%. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 4 years were 64.5% +/- 5.1% and 55.6% +/- 5.0%, respectively. The cumulative incident of relapse for the HRD-HSCT group was significantly lower than that for the chemotherapy-alone group (12.0% +/- 4.6% vs 57.8% +/- 6.2%, respectively; P < .0001). HRD-HSCT resulted in superior survival compared with chemotherapy alone (4-year DFS, 73.1% +/- 7.1% vs 44.2% +/- 6.2%, respectively; P < .0001; 4-year OS, 77.5% +/- 7.1% vs 54.7% +/- 6.3%, respectively; P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed postremission treatment (HRD-HSCT vs chemotherapy) and high WBC counts at diagnosis as independent risk factors affecting relapse, DFS, and OS. Our results suggest that HRD-HSCT is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for AML. (Blood. 2012;119(23):5584-5590)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available