4.7 Article

T-cell immunity to Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus: recognition of primary effusion lymphoma by LANA-specific CD4+ T cells

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 9, Pages 2083-2092

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-366476

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council United Kingdom [G0501074]
  2. MRC [MC_U137884180, G0501074, MC_U190085854] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U137884180, G0501074, MC_U190085854, G9818340B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

T-cell immunity is important for controlling Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) diseases such as the endothelial cell malignancy Kaposi sarcoma, or the B-cell malignancy, primary effusion lymphoma (PEL). However, little is known about KSHV-specific T-cell immunity in healthy donors and immune control of disease. Using PBMCs from healthy KSHV-infected donors, we found weak ex vivo responses to the KSHV latent antigens LANA, vFLIP, vCyclin, and Kaposin, with LANA most frequently recognized. CD4(+) T-cell clones specific to LANA, a protein expressed in all KSHV-infected cells and malignancies, were established to determine whether they could recognize LANA-expressing cells. B-cell targets expressing or fed LANAprotein were consistently recognized by the clones; however, most PEL cell lines were not. PELs express the KSHV protein vIRF3 that inhibits promoter function of the HLA class II transactivator, decreasing expression of genes controlled by this transactivator. Re-expressing the class II transactivator in the PELs increased expression of downstream targets such as HLA class II and restored recognition but not killing by the LANA-specific clones. We suggest that PELs are poorly controlled in vivo because of inefficient recognition and killing by T cells. (Blood. 2012; 119(9): 2083-2092)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available