4.7 Article

Mutant DNMT3A: a marker of poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 24, Pages 5824-5831

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-367961

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Leukemia BioCHIP project [03O-102]
  2. Dutch Cancer Society (Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds)
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) [CM08/00 027]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Health, Spain
  5. Capes/Brazil
  6. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Translational Research Program [6196-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence, the prognostic effect, and interaction with other molecular markers of DNMT3A mutations was studied in 415 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) younger than 60 years. We show mutations in DNMT3A in 96 of 415 patients with newly diagnosed AML (23.1%). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients with DNMT3A(mutant) AML show significantly worse overall survival (OS; P = .022; hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.81), and relapse-free survival (RFS; P = .005; HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.13-2.05) than DNMT3A(wild-type) AMLs. In a multivariable analysis, DNMT3A mutations express independent unfavorable prognostic value for OS (P = .003; HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7) and RFS (P < .001; HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.3). In a composite genotypic subset of cytogenetic intermediate-risk AML without FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations, this association is particularly evident (OS: P = .013; HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.16-3.77; RFS: P = .001; HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.48-4.89). The effect of DNMT3A mutations in human AML remains elusive, because DNMT3A(mutant) AMLs did not express a methylation or gene expression signature that discriminates them from patients with DNMT3A(wild-type) AML. We conclude that DNMT3A mutation status is an important factor to consider for risk stratification of patients with AML. (Blood. 2012;119(24):5824-5831)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available