4.7 Article

Aclinically relevant population of leukemic CD34+CD38- cells in acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 15, Pages 3571-3577

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-364182

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  2. National Institutes of Health [P01 CA15396, P01 CA070970, U01 CA70095, 5T32 HL007525]
  3. American Society of Hematology
  4. Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is thought to reflect the failure of current therapies to adequately target leukemia stem cells (LSCs), the rare, resistant cells presumed responsible for maintenance of the leukemia and typically enriched in the CD34(+)CD38(-) cell population. Despite the considerable research on LSCs over the past 2 decades, the clinical significance of these cells remains uncertain. However, if clinically relevant, it is expected that LSCs would be enriched in minimal residual disease and predictive of relapse. CD34(+) subpopulations from AML patients were analyzed by flow cytometry throughout treatment. Sorted cell populations were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization for leukemia-specific cytogenetic abnormalities (when present) and by transplantation into immunodeficient mice to determine self-renewal capacity. Intermediate (int) levels of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity reliably distinguished leukemic CD34(+)CD38(-) cells capable of engrafting immunodeficient mice from residual normal hematopoietic stem cells that exhibited relatively higher ALDH activity. Minimal residual disease detected during complete remission was enriched for the CD34(+)CD38(-)ALDH(int) leukemic cells, and the presence of these cells after therapy highly correlated with subsequent clinical relapse. ALDH activity appears to distinguish normal from leukemic CD34(+)CD38(-) cells and identifies those AML cells associated with relapse. (Blood. 2012;119(15):3571-3577)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available