4.7 Article

Site-specific gene correction of a point mutation in human iPS cells derived from an adult patient with sickle cell disease

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 118, Issue 17, Pages 4599-4608

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-335554

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Siebel scholarship
  2. Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund [2008-MSCRFF-009, 2010-MSCRFE-0044, 2010-MSCRFF-0095]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL073781, HL073781-05S1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) bearing monogenic mutations have great potential for modeling disease phenotypes, screening candidate drugs, and cell replacement therapy provided the underlying disease-causing mutation can be corrected. Here, we report a homologous recombination-based approach to precisely correct the sickle cell disease (SCD) mutation in patient-derived iPSCs with 2 mutated beta-globin alleles (beta(s)/beta(s)). Using a gene-targeting plasmid containing a loxP-flanked drug-resistant gene cassette to assist selection of rare targeted clones and zinc finger nucleases engineered to specifically stimulate homologous recombination at the beta(s) locus, we achieved precise conversion of 1 mutated beta(s) to the wild-type beta(A) in SCD iPSCs. However, the resulting co-integration of the selection gene cassette into the first intron suppressed the corrected allele transcription. After Cre recombinase-mediated excision of this loxP-flanked selection gene cassette, we obtained secondary gene-corrected beta(s)/beta(A) heterozygous iPSCs that express at 25% to 40% level of the wild-type transcript when differentiated into erythrocytes. These data demonstrate that single nucleotide substitution in the human genome is feasible using human iPSCs. This study also provides a new strategy for gene therapy of monogenic diseases using patient-specific iPSCs, even if the underlying disease-causing mutation is not expressed in iPSCs. (Blood. 2011; 118(17): 4599-4608)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available