4.7 Article

Frequent loss of HLA alleles associated with copy number-neutral 6pLOH in acquired aplastic anemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 118, Issue 25, Pages 6601-6609

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-365189

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659486] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Idiopathic aplastic anemia (AA) is a common cause of acquired BM failure. Although autoimmunity to hematopoietic progenitors is thought to be responsible for its pathogenesis, little is known about the molecular basis of this autoimmunity. Here we show that a substantial proportion of AA patients harbor clonal hematopoiesis characterized by the presence of acquired copy number-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CNN-LOH) of the 6p arms (6pLOH). The 6pLOH commonly involved the HLA locus, leading to loss of one HLA haplotype. Loss of HLA-Aexpression from multiple lineages of leukocytes was confirmed by flow cytometry in all 6pLOH(+) cases. Surprisingly, the missing HLA-alleles in 6pLOH(+) clones were conspicuously biased to particular alleles, including HLA-A*02: 01, A*02:06, A*31:01, and B*40:02. A large-scale epidemiologic study on the HLA alleles of patients with various hematologic diseases revealed that the 4 HLA alleles were over-represented in the germline of AA patients. These findings indicate that the 6pLOH(+) hematopoiesis found in AA represents escapes hematopoiesis from the autoimmunity, which is mediated by cytotoxic T cells that target the relevant autoantigens presented on hematopoietic progenitors through these class I HLAs. Our results provide a novel insight into the genetic basis of the pathogenesis of AA. (Blood. 2011;118(25):6601-6609)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available