4.7 Article

Aberrant interferon-signaling is associated with aggressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 117, Issue 9, Pages 2668-2680

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-285999

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ontario Institute of Cancer Research [07Nov-61]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [190633]
  3. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada
  4. National Cancer Institute of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The type I interferons (IFNs) normally suppress tumor growth by phosphorylating and activating the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), but also briefly activate STAT3, which promotes cell growth. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells, the duration of IFN-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation was found to exhibit significant interpatient variability and was prolonged in cells with high risk features, such as 11q- and 17p- deletions involving ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and p53. This aberrant signaling pattern was associated with a paradoxical increase in cell size and number in response to IFN and similar alterations in IFN-signaling and responses were seen in cell lines that developed in the absence of p53 or ATM. However, direct inhibition of p53 or ATM failed to cause these changes, and CLL cells with aggressive clinical features were found to also express high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which decrease tyrosine phosphatase activity. Prolonged IFN-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation and lowered phosphatase activity could be reversed by antioxidants. These findings suggest that increased ROS levels may corrupt IFN-signaling processes in aggressive CLL cells, causing IFN to be used as a growth factor rather than a tumor suppressor. Antioxidants or STAT3 kinase inhibitors might improve the outcome of IFN therapy in CLL by restoring normal signaling. (Blood. 2011; 117(9): 2668-2680)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available