4.7 Article

Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with primary immunodeficiency: United Kingdom experience

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 117, Issue 16, Pages 4367-4375

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-312082

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0701897] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V0904, V1242] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0701897] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0701897] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Children with primary immunodeficiency diseases, particularly those less than 1 year of age, experience significant toxicity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with busulfan- or melphalan-based conditioning. Treosulfan causes less veno-occlusive disease than busulfan and does not require pharmacokinetic monitoring. We report its use in 70 children. Children received 42 g/m(2) or 36 g/m(2) with cyclophosphamide 200 mg/kg (n = 30) or fludarabine 150 mg/m(2) (n = 40), with alemtuzumab in most. Median age at transplantation was 8.5 months (range, 1.2-175 months); 46 (66%) patients were 12 months of age or younger. Donors were as follows: matched sibling donor, 8; matched family donor, 13; haploidentical, 4; and unrelated, 45. Median follow-up was 19 months (range, 1-47 months). Overall survival was 81%, equivalent in those age less or greater than 1 year. Skin toxicity was common. Veno-occlusive disease occurred twice with cyclophosphamide. Eighteen patients (26%) had graft-versus-host disease, and only 7 (10%) greater than grade 2. Two patients rejected; 24 of 42 more than 1 year after transplantation had 100% donor chimerism. The remainder had stable mixed chimerism. T-cell chimerism was significantly better with fludarabine. Long-term follow-up is required, but in combination with fludarabine, treosulfan is a good choice of conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary immunodeficiency disease. (Blood. 2011; 117(16):4367-4375)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available