4.7 Article

The strategy for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis should depend on both the underlying condition and the leukocyte count of patients with hematologic malignancies

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 8, Pages 1831-1837

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-351601

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. La Ligue Contre le Cancer
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) laboratories
  3. Schering-Plough
  4. Pfizer
  5. Genzyme
  6. MSD-Chibret
  7. Gilead
  8. Merck Sharp Dohme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identification of the causative organism in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is recommended. We investigated whether a mycologic diagnostic strategy could be optimized based on patient characteristics. Fifty-five patients were enrolled in a prospective study. The presence of Aspergillus in respiratory samples occurred more frequently in non-acute leukemia (AL) patients than in AL patients (P = .0003), and in patients with leukocyte counts more than 100/mm(3) (P = .002). In a logistic regression model, these 2 factors appeared to be independent, with an adjusted odds ratio of 7.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.40-36.5) for non-AL patients and an adjusted odds ratio of 6.97 (95% confidence interval, 1.33-36.5) for patients with leukocyte counts more than 100/mm3. A positive mycologic result was also more frequent among patients with lung CT scan signs of airway-invasive disease than among other patients (P = .043). Airway-invasive signs were more frequent among non-AL patients (P = .049), whereas angioinvasive disease was more frequent among both AL patients (P = .01) and patients with leukocyte counts less than 100/mm(3) (P = .001). A concomitant pulmonary infection was identified more frequently among non-AL patients (P = .005 vs allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and P = .048 vs others). Our results suggest that different strategies for diagnosing IPA should be considered based on the underlying condition. (Blood. 2012;119(8):1831-1837)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available