4.7 Article

Contrasting dynamic responses in vivo of the Bcl-xL and Bim erythropoietic survival pathways

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages 1228-1239

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-365346

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [RO1 HL084168]
  2. Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center [DK32520]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Survival signaling by the erythropoietin (Epo) receptor (EpoR) is essential for erythropoiesis and for its acceleration in hypoxic stress. Several apparently redundant EpoR survival pathways were identified in vitro, raising the possibility of their functional specialization in vivo. Here we used mouse models of acute and chronic stress, including a hypoxic environment and beta-thalassemia, to identify two markedly different response dynamics for two erythroblast survival pathways in vivo. Induction of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-x(L) is rapid but transient, while suppression of the proapoptotic protein Bim is slower but persistent. Similar to sensory adaptation, however, the Bcl-x(L) pathway resets, allowing it to respond afresh to acute stress superimposed on a chronic stress stimulus. Using knock-in mouse models expressing mutant EpoRs, we found that adaptation in the Bcl-x(L) response occurs because of adaptation of its upstream regulator Stat5, both requiring the EpoR distal cytoplasmic domain. We conclude that survival pathways show previously unsuspected functional specialization for the acute and chronic phases of the stress response. Bcl-x(L) induction provides a stop-gap in acute stress, until slower but permanent pathways are activated. Furthermore, pathologic elevation of Bcl-x(L) may be the result of impaired adaptation, with implications for myeloproliferative disease mechanisms. (Blood. 2012;119(5):1228-1239)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available